Submissions
Submission Preparation Checklist
As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.- The manuscript has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
- The manuscript submission file can be in DOCX, PDF, or HTML (preferably adherent to the journal format). Accepted manuscripts will have to be reformatted into the adherent HTML format of JSimE.
- The manuscript adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
- The manuscript has been checked for spelling and grammar.
- The Title is short and informative.
- Author names and their affiliations have been provided.
- The Abstract can be read as stand-alone text.
- Relevant keywords (at least 3 and at most 5) describing the manuscript has been provided.
- All references mentioned in the Bibliography are cited in the text and vice-versa.
- All references are provided with web links (URLs).
- Permission has been obtained for use of copyrighted material from other sources including the Web.
- All necessary declarations have been made.
SIMULTECH 2022
Although JSimE operates a double-blind peer review process. The SIMULTECH 2022 section editors in agreement with the Journal editors decided to operate a blind-peer review process for this conference submissions. All manuscripts are initially screened by the Section Editors for suitability to the journal. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two reviewers selected by the Section Editor according to the submission topic. The reviewers might be members of the editorial board, conference Program Committee members or ad hoc specialists on the topic. Authors may suggest reviewers that may or may not be selected by the Section Editor. The Section Editor together with the Journal Editor are responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of manuscripts. Once the reviewers have commented, the Editors decide whether the manuscript is Accepted as is, Accepted with Minor Revision, requested to Revise and Resubmit, Rejected, or informed it is Out of Journal Scope.
SIMULTECH 2023
Although JSimE operates a double-blind peer review process. The SIMULTECH 2023 section editors in agreement with the Journal editors decided to operate a blind-peer review process for this conference submissions. All manuscripts are initially screened by the Section Editors for suitability to the journal. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two reviewers selected by the Section Editor according to the submission topic. The reviewers might be members of the editorial board, conference Program Committee members or ad hoc specialists on the topic. Authors may suggest reviewers that may or may not be selected by the Section Editor. The Section Editor together with the Journal Editor are responsible for the final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of manuscripts. Once the reviewers have commented, the Editors decide whether the manuscript is Accepted as is, Accepted with Minor Revision, requested to Revise and Resubmit, Rejected, or informed it is Out of Journal Scope.
Copyright Notice
All manuscripts published in JSimE are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Submission of a manuscript to JSimE assumes the acceptance of this license.
Privacy Statement
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.